Patricia Arquette at the 64th Annual Golden Globe Awards

Comments

1. JCW says:

   January 16, 2007 at 11:31 am

   Where to start? Unfortunate? Unattractive?

   First off, the hair. Hair is one thing Patty usually does right. Who’s bright idea was it
   to darken it a few shades and wear it in the style of a prison matron from a 1960’s era exploitation movie? Seriously, that ‘do should only be worn with a big round key ring and a night stick.

   Makeup; Again, an area Patty usually gets right.
   Blotchy, cakey around the eyes showing EVERY wrinkle and line, and worst of all HARD! All that Mascara and liner make her usually beautiful eyes look small and piggy.

   And then there’s….the DRESS! OK – it would seem that Patty has gotten the message since the infamous “Boob Dress” incident. (You KNOW she reads this blog!) Now our girl chooses to go the other way and remain properly covered – even attempting to make her breasts “dissappear” behind a discreet black bar superimposed over her all evening to hide the naughty bits. OH..wait – that’s actually part of the dress! Well, OK, I suppose if one wishes to run around all evening with their breasts tightly bound in black vinyl
   they have that right.

   In the end, what can you say? Does it fit too tightly and emphasize figure flaws? Is it original and unusual looking in an ugly way?
   Yep. That’s our Patty.

   The real kiss of death? Walking the red carpet with your 50+ year old big sister and she STILL looks younger and fresher than you do. And that’s
   despite wearing a dress herself that looks like it’s last outing was on the back of some 90 year old woman who attended Bush Sr.’s inaugural ball back in the 80s.

   Sigh. Well at least we still have the S.A.G. awards to look forward to…there’s always hope.